Date/Time : 14 Apr 2021 17:00
Venue : via Zoom
Speaker : Karen Seidel, University of Potsdam

Join Zoom Meeting https://nus-sg.zoom.us/j/96860201432?pwd=cVdwZmd2clVFaEhaTmJjaGdXMFdmdz09 Meeting ID: 968 6020 1432 Password: Is P=NP? Learning from positive and negative information, so called informant, is one of the models for human and machine learning introduced by Gold. We review existing classical and recent results regarding the learning power of associated settings.

Add to calendar :

Date/Time : 07 Apr 2021 17:00
Venue : via Zoom
Speaker : Frank Stephan, National University of Singapore

Talk via Zoom: https://nus-sg.zoom.us/j/96860201432?pwd=cVdwZmd2clVFaEhaTmJjaGdXMFdmdz09 Meeting ID: 968 6020 1432 Password: Is P=NP? In the year 2013, Keng Meng Ng, Frank Stephan, Yue Yang and Liang Yu published the paper “Computational Aspects of the Hyperimmune-free Degrees” and one of the results was given without a proof. The current talk gives the full proof of this result. In particular, the talk provides the full details of the construction of an co-r.e.\ infinite binary tree with uncountablly many branches which are all hyperimmune-free, Schnorr-trivial, jump traceable, generalised low and of minimal Turing degree. Hyperimmune-free means that every function Turing reducible to it is majorised by a recursive function. Jump traceable means that for every e one can compute an explicit bound on the number of elements which some further set also depending on e enumerates and that finite set contains the Jump value at e. Generalised low means that the jump of A is recursive in the join of A and K. A minimal Turing degree is a nonrecursive Turing degree below which is only the recursive one. Schnorr trivial means that for every f truth-table reducible to the set there is a recursive function which lists out for each input x a set of x+1 many values with one of them being f(x).

Add to calendar :

Date/Time : 31 Mar 2021 17:00
Venue : via Zoom
Speaker : Lars Kristiansen, University of Oslo

Join Zoom Meeting https://nus-sg.zoom.us/j/96860201432?pwd=cVdwZmd2clVFaEhaTmJjaGdXMFdmdz09 Meeting ID: 968 6020 1432 Password: Is P=NP? We will address the following question: Do we need, or do we not need, unbounded search in order to convert one representation of an irrational number into another representation? We will consider well known representations like Cauchy sequences, Dedekind cuts, base-2 expansions, base-10 expansions and continued fractions, and maybe a few less well-know representations.

Add to calendar :

Date/Time : 24 Mar 2021 17:00
Venue : via Zoom
Speaker : Philipp Schlicht, University of Vienna

Join Zoom Meeting https://nus-sg.zoom.us/j/96860201432?pwd=cVdwZmd2clVFaEhaTmJjaGdXMFdmdz09 Meeting ID: 968 6020 1432 Password: Is P=NP? Abstract: While descriptive set theory studies definable sets of words of length omega, generalised descriptive set theory studies words of uncountable regular length. The talk will begin with an introduction to this field and its applications. I will then talk about how one can characterise when a definable set is small or admits a colouring with few colours with respect to an open graph. This is joint work with Dorottya Sziraki.

Add to calendar :

Date/Time : 18 Mar 2021 10:00
Venue : via Zoom
Speaker : Ko Liling,

oin Zoom Meeting https://nus-sg.zoom.us/j/96860201432?pwd=cVdwZmd2clVFaEhaTmJjaGdXMFdmdz09 Meeting ID: 968 6020 1432 Password: Is P=NP? Given a finite lattice L that can be embedded in the recursively enumerable (r.e.) Turing degrees (R,<) we do not in general know how to characterize the degrees d in R below which L can be bounded. The important characterizations known so far are of the L_7 and 1-3-1 lattices, where the former is bounded exactly by the degrees with fickleness strictly above omega and the latter is bounded exactly by the degrees containing sets of fickleness greater equal omega^omega. Given that the fickleness hierarchy collapses exactly to the powers of omega with the first few levels being 0,omega,omega^2,…,omega^omega, we want to find a lattice that characterizes the levels strictly above omega^2. We begin by exhausting the lattices L that are as “small” as L_7 and 1-3-1, but these lattices turn out to characterize the levels strictly above omega or from omega^omega onwards, if L is not already embeddable below all non-zero r.e. degrees. We even considered small infinite lattices but they too behave like L_7 or 1-3-1. We discovered three lattices besides 1-3-1 that also characterize the levels from omega^omega onwards. Our search for a candidate characterising the levels strictly above omega^2 therefore involves the lattice-theoretic problem of finding lattices that do not contain any of the four sublattices which characterise the levels from omega^omega onwards as a sublattice. Using this criterion as a heuristic we introduce the wide diamond lattice as a candidate, though we conjecture that this lattice also behaves like 1-3-1.

Add to calendar :

Date/Time : 10 Mar 2021 17:00
Venue : via Zoom
Speaker : Zekun Jia,

Join Zoom Meeting https://nus-sg.zoom.us/j/96860201432?pwd=cVdwZmd2clVFaEhaTmJjaGdXMFdmdz09 Meeting ID: 968 6020 1432 Password: Is P=NP? Abstract: There are a lot of theorems in Ramsey theory whose proof explicitly or implicitly uses the Axiom of Choice. This talk will focus on Ramsey’s Theorem and Open Ramsey Theorem in three models of set theory where the Axiom of Choice fails (the basic Cohen model, the basic Fraenkel model, and the ordered Mostowski model), as well as some consistency and independence results that follow. Also, the usual proof of Open Ramsey Theorem on omega given by Galvin and Prikry assumes the Axiom of Dependent Choice, and this talk will sketch an improvement on that proof to make it purely constructive. This project is advised by Zach Norwood.

Add to calendar :

Date/Time : 03 Mar 2021 17:00
Venue : via Zoom
Speaker : Desmond Lau,

Join Zoom Meeting https://nus-sg.zoom.us/j/96860201432?pwd=cVdwZmd2clVFaEhaTmJjaGdXMFdmdz09 Meeting ID: 968 6020 1432 Password: Is P=NP? Abstract: Martin’s Maximum^{++} and Woodin’s axiom (*) are two statements independent of, but consistent with, ZFC. I will present the common reasons they are appealing as set-theoretic axioms, before comparing the sense in which they are “maximal”. I will also run through an exposition of the recent work by Aspero and Schindler, which shows Martin’s Maximum^{++} implies (*), effectively “unifying” the statements.

Add to calendar :

Date/Time : 17 Feb 2021 17:00
Venue : via Zoom
Speaker : Xiao Ming, National University of Singapore

Join Zoom Meeting https://nus-sg.zoom.us/j/96860201432?pwd=cVdwZmd2clVFaEhaTmJjaGdXMFdmdz09 Meeting ID: 968 6020 1432 Password: Is P=NP? Abstract: Order dimension is a classical combinatorial object and has been widely studied by set theorists, combinatorists and computer scientists since its introduction by Dushnik and Miller in 1941. We focus on the partial orderings that are definable as a Borel subsets in a Polish space and analyze the order dimension that can be realized by Borel definable orders and show that there are some interesting behaviors that can be quite different from the classical order dimension using arbitrary realization. This is a joint work with Dilip Raghavan.

Add to calendar :

Date/Time : 03 Feb 2021 17:00
Venue : via Zoom
Speaker : Wong Tin Lok, National University of Singapore

Join Zoom Meeting https://nus-sg.zoom.us/j/96860201432?pwd=cVdwZmd2clVFaEhaTmJjaGdXMFdmdz09 Meeting ID: 968 6020 1432 Password: Is P=NP? Abstract: Arithmetic generally does not admit any non-trivial quantifier elimination. I will talk about one exception, where the negation of an induction axiom is included in the theory. Here the Weak Koenig’s Lemma from reverse mathematics arises as a model completion. This work is joint with Marta Fiori-Carones, Leszek Aleksander Kolodziejczyk and Keita Yokoyama.

Add to calendar :